Cases — May 22nd through 28th, 2022

Discrimination ~ Retaliation *Rushing v. Granholm (10th Cir., May 27, 2022) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendants on Rushing’s claims for disability, national-origin, and sexual-orientation discrimination and retaliation for his filing an equal employment opportunity complaint: Rushing failed to present sufficient evidence of an adverse employment action, nor did he demonstrate pretext on […]

Read More

Cases — May 1st through 7th, 2022

DISCRIMINATION ~ RETALIATION *Peterson v. Williams (10th Cir., May 5, 2022) (affirming defendants’ motion to dismiss Peterson’s first-amendment retaliation claim: Peterson failed to plausibly plead that he spoke as a citizen on a matter of public concern) *Cases marked with an asterisk are not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, […]

Read More

Cases — April 24th through 30th, 2022

DISCRIMINATION ~ RETALIATION Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, PLLC (U.S., April 28, 2022) (affirming denial of emotional distress damages in connection with Cummings’ claim of disability discrimination for Premier Rehab’s failure to provide an ASL interpreter in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Affordable Care Act: damages for emotional harm are not […]

Read More

Cases—April 3rd through 9th, 2022

CONTRACT ~ NONCOMPETE ~ TRADE SECRET ~ WRONGFUL TERMINATION *Booth v. Home Depot (10th Cir., April 5, 2022) (affirming dismissal of Booth’s complaint for wrongful termination pursuant to Burk v. KMart Corp., 770 P.2d 24 (Okla. 1989), a court-created cause of action to redress a termination in violation of “a clear mandate of public policy”: […]

Read More

Cases—March 27th through April 2nd, 2022

Contract~Noncompete~Trade Secret~Wrongful Termination *Clarkson v. Board of Regents (10th Cir., March 31, 2022) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the Board of Regents on Clarkson’s breach of contract and § 1983 claims: The defendants were not “persons” amenable to suit under § 1983, and the evidence did not show a violation of Clarkson’s constitutional rights. […]

Read More

Cases—March 6th through 12th, 2022

Discrimination ~ Retaliation Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Roark-Whitten Hospitality 2, LP (10th Cir., March 10, 2022) (among other things, reversing compensatory damages award against Roark-Whitten on the EEOC’s claims against it for unlawful employment practices: the district court failed to explain why it ordered compensatory damages in the amount of only $35,000 despite the […]

Read More

Cases—February 27th through March 5th, 2022

Discrimination~Retaliation Stroup v. United Airlines, Inc. (10th Cir., February 28, 2022) (affirming district court judgment, and denial of United’s motion for judgment as a matter of law: there was sufficient evidence for the jury to reasonably find not only that United violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, but that it did so willfully (lengthy […]

Read More

Cases — February 13th through 19th, 2022

Contract ~ Noncompete ~ Trade Secrets ~ Wrongful Termination *Donez v. Leprino Foods, Inc. (10th Cir., February 18, 2022) (affirming summary judgment for Leprino on Donez’s claims for wrongful-termination against public policy and discrimination: even if Colorado recognized self-defense as an exception to at-will termination, Donez failed to show that he was fired due to […]

Read More

Cases — February 6th through 12th, 2022

Contract ~ Noncompete ~ Trade Secret ~ Wrongful Termination *Keybank Nat’l Assoc. v. Williams (10th Cir., February 10, 2022) (affirming denial of Keybank’s motion for preliminary injunction to prevent defendants from doing business with and soliciting KeyBank’s customers and misappropriating its trade secret and confidential information: KeyBank failed to show a probability of irreparable harm) […]

Read More

Cases — January 23rd through 29th, 2022

Discrimination ~ Retaliation *Barker v. Utah Department of Environmental Quality (10th Cir., January 28, 2022) (affirming dismissal Barker’s complaint for retaliation against her because of her earlier, settled lawsuit from 2015: Barker failed to name the DEQ as the defendant in her amended complaint, did not timely file her discrimination charge with the EEOC, and […]

Read More