Cases — October 2nd through 8th, 2022

Workers Compensation ~ Occupational Safety and Disease *Gielissen v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (10th Cir., October 7, 2022) (affirming Reliance Standard’s decision to terminate benefits: Reliance Standard properly relied on the evidence of the surveillance videos to determine that Gielissen was no longer restricted from performing any occupation) *Cases marked with an asterisk are […]

Read More

Cases — January 23rd through 29th, 2022

Discrimination ~ Retaliation *Barker v. Utah Department of Environmental Quality (10th Cir., January 28, 2022) (affirming dismissal Barker’s complaint for retaliation against her because of her earlier, settled lawsuit from 2015: Barker failed to name the DEQ as the defendant in her amended complaint, did not timely file her discrimination charge with the EEOC, and […]

Read More

Cases — January 9th through 15th, 2022

ERISA and Employee Pension Plans Babcock v. Kijakazi (U.S., January 13, 2022) (affirming determination that Babcock’s retirement benefits should be reduced (a “windfall elimination”) to reflect his receipt of both a civil-service pension and military pension payments for his work as a dual-status National Guard technician: Civil-service pension payments based on employment as a dual-status […]

Read More

Cases — September 19th through 25th, 2021

Discrimination~Retaliation *Hill v. SER Jobs for Progress National, Inc. (10th Cir., September 21, 2021) (reversing summary judgment in favor of SER on Hill’s employment discrimination and retaliation claims: although SER claimed Hill was not an employee, the record was inconclusive for purposes of Title VII; the matter was remanded for determination) ERISA and Employee Pension […]

Read More

Cases — August 29th through September 4th, 2021

Discrimination ~ Retaliation *Davis v. State of Utah (10th Cir., September 2, 2021) (affirming dismissal of plaintiffs’ employment-related claims against Utah and the University of Utah: plaintiffs’ First-Amendment allegations failed to overcome their qualified-immunity burden, and plaintiffs’ state-law claims were untimely) *Guy v. McDonough (10th Cir., August 30, 2021) (affirming summary judgment in favor of […]

Read More

Cases — July 25th through 31st, 2021

Discrimination ~ Retaliation Duda v. Elder (10th Cir., July 27, 2021) (affirming denial of qualified immunity to Sheriff Elder on Duda’s retaliation claim: the sheriff fired Deputy Duda for violating “a neutral policy prohibiting on-duty political activity,” but he did not apply it neutrally: he allowed political activity in his favor but fired Duda when […]

Read More

Cases — June 6th through 12th, 2021

ERISA & Employee Pension Plans Ramps v. Banner Health (10th Cir., June 11, 2021) (affirming district court calculation of damages, denial of injunction, and judgment in favor of Banner on plaintiffs’ prohibited transaction claim: plaintiffs’ damages calculations were improperly vague; they failed to make a showing that injunctive or equitable relief was appropriate; and ERISA […]

Read More

Cases — April 18th through 24th, 2021

Contract ~ Noncompete ~ Trade Secret ~ Wrongful Termination *Williams v. United States (10th Cir., April 22, 2021) (dismissing Williams’ appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction: Williams raised no nonfrivolous argument for reversal of the the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States on his claims for tortious interference […]

Read More

Cases — April 4th through 10th, 2021

ERISA and Employee Pension Plans *Retired Public Employees of New Mexico, Inc. v. Probst (10th Cir., April 6, 2021) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Probst on their Section 1983 procedural and substantive due process claims: the federal claims against Probst and Pittard (the other defendant) were subject to dismissal based on the 11th Amendment) […]

Read More

Cases — February 14th through 20th, 2021

ERISA and Employee Pension Plans  *Festini-Steele v. Exxonmobil Corp. (10th Cir., February 18, 2021) (Reversing lower court determination that divorce decree was not a qualified domestic relations order, and that Festini-Steele was therefore not entitled to the proceeds of her ex-husband’s group life insurance policy: the order was plainly a QDRO and thus exempt from […]

Read More