Cases — February 25th through March 3rd, 2018

Discrimination/Retaliation*Starr v. Quiktrip Corporation (10th Cir., March 1, 2018) (affirming judgment in favor of Quiktrip on Starr’s Uniformed Services Employment & Reemployment Rights Act:  Starr did not show any reversible error.*Winston v. Ross (10th Cir., February 27, 2018) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the National Weather Service (Ross): Winston did not establish a prima facie discrimination […]

Read More

Tenth Circuit: Arbitrator Reinstating Employee Violating Rules and Lying About It Was Not Outside of the “Essence” of the CBA

The Tenth Circuit ruled that an arbitrator drew from the essence of the labor contract when he reinstated an employee and imposed a last chance agreement on the employee despite the employee having violated a company rule and then lying about it.  In Chevron Mining Inc. v. United Mine Workers of America Local 1307, the […]

Read More

United States Supreme Court: If a Supervisor Performs an Act Motivated by Antimilitary Animus, Employers May Be Liable Even If a Different Supervisor Fires the Employee

In Staub v. Proctor Hospital, an opinion issued today, the United States Supreme Court ruled  that an employer can be liable for a violation of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) even if the supervisor who ultimately made the decision to discipline an employee was not motivated by anti-military animus.  The Court […]

Read More

Former KMart Store Manager Did Not Suffer Discrimination

In Gardner v. Sears Holding Corporation, the Tenth Circuit upheld a trial court’s order granting summary judgment against a man who claimed he was discriminated against on the basis of his age and race when his employment was terminated.  The court ruled that because “Kmart had established legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for reprimanding Mr. Gardner by […]

Read More

Employee’s Failure to Identify that Her Termination was a Result of Discrimination Defeated her Discrimination Claim

In Logdson v. Turbines, Inc., the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a former employee who filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC that contended she had been discriminated against when she was demoted, was not promoted, and was disciplined did not preserve her claims of discriminatory termination.  The court ruled that “it […]

Read More

EMPLOYERS BEWARE! New Case Expands Employee Protection and Claims Substantially

On April 23, 2010, the Utah Supreme Court substantially expanded the rights of employees to bring claims for emotional distress against former employers. In Cabanese v. Thomas, the Court ruled that the date the statute of limitations is triggered is “at the time the last injury occurred or the tortious conduct ceases.” Accordingly, in repeated […]

Read More

An Employee Must Show Employer Knew Statements Were False or Recklessly Disregarded Truth in Making Defamation Claim.

In a decision issued July 31, 2009, the Utah Supreme Court ruled that in order for an employee to prevail on a defamation claim against his or her former employer, the employee must show that the employer knew the statements were false or acted in reckless disregard of the truth of the statement. The case, […]

Read More

Does Relatively Minor Sexually Harassing Behavior Trigger an Employee’s Duty to Report the Conduct?

In a case decided on Thursday, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals—the appellate court having jurisdiction over Utah— upheld the dismissal of a complaint brought by a woman against the Colorado Department of Transportation for sexual harassment and retaliation she claimed occurred while she was working for the agency as an administrative assistant. In the […]

Read More

Employees Who Never File Complaints about Sexual Harassment But Merely Answer Questions are Protected from Retaliation.

The United States Supreme Court ruled in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government that a local government employee who answered questions posed to her about a human resource employee’s alleged sexual harassment was protected from retaliation even when she did not file her own complaint about his behavior. The questions came during an internal investigation being conducted […]

Read More