Cases — May 20th through 26th, 2018

Discrimination/Retaliation *Christmon v. B&B Airparts, Inc. (10th Cir., May 24, 2018) (affirming summary judgment in favor of B&B on Christmon’s religious discrimination claim: B&B reasonably accommodated Christmon’s beliefs) Labor Unions Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (U.S., May 21, 2018) (The Federal Arbitration Act mandates that arbitration agreements providing for individual proceedings be enforced as written) […]

Read More

Cases — October 23rd through 29th

Discrimination/Retaliation*Rusk v. State of Utah (10th Cir., October 26, 2016) (affirming dismissal of Rusk’s discrimination/retaliation claim as barred by sovereign immunity)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. They may be cited, however, for […]

Read More

Tenth Circuit: Arbitrator Reinstating Employee Violating Rules and Lying About It Was Not Outside of the “Essence” of the CBA

The Tenth Circuit ruled that an arbitrator drew from the essence of the labor contract when he reinstated an employee and imposed a last chance agreement on the employee despite the employee having violated a company rule and then lying about it.  In Chevron Mining Inc. v. United Mine Workers of America Local 1307, the […]

Read More

Utah Health Care Facilities Not Immune for Negligently Credentialing Their Doctors

On May 14, 2010, the Utah Supreme Court ruled that Utah health care facilities are not immune from claims brought by patients against them asserting that the facilities were negligent when they credential doctors or health care professionals at their hospitals.  In Archuleta v. St. Mark’s Hospital, the Court stated that “negligent credentialing is ‘simply the […]

Read More

Demotion Without Reduction in Pay is Not Appealable

In Olson v. Utah Department of Health, the Utah Court of Appeals ruled that the Career Service Review Board (CSRB), established for review of certain disciplinary actions taken against state employees, did not have jurisdiction over the appeal of a disciplinary transfer of an employee. It ruled this way even though when originally transferred the […]

Read More