Discrimination~Retaliation
*Flowers v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (10th Cir., November 29, 2022) (affirming summary judgment in favor of UPS on Flowers’ age discrimination and retaliation claims: Flowers failed to raise any genuine issues for trial on any of his claims)
*Painter v. Midwest Health, Inc.; Pioneer Ridge Nursing Facility Operations, LLC (10th Cir., November 30, 2022) (affirming summary judgment in favor of defendants on Painter’s claims for reverse race discrimination, retaliation, tortious interference with prospective contractual relationships, and blacklisting: Painter showed no evidence of reverse discrimination or retaliatory motive, could show no triable issue on the question of malice as to her claim for tortious interference, and could not show the criminal blacklisting conviction necessary for a successful civil blacklisting claim under Kansas law)
*Cases marked with an asterisk are not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel.
