Discrimination ~ Retaliation
*Gaskin v. Science Applications International, Inc. (10th Cir., November 8, 2019) (affirming summary judgment in favor of SAI on Gaskin’s sex discrimination claim: SAI had a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason—inappropriate conduct—to terminate Gaskin)
Tesone v. Empire Marketing Strategies (10th Cir., November 8, 2019) (reversing summary judgment in favor of Empire on Tesone’s ADA discrimintion claim: medical expert testimony is not necessary to prove a disability in discrimination cases brought under the ADA)
*Davis v. Unified School District No. 512 (10th Cir., November 7, 2019) (affirming summary judgment in favor of School District: reassignment such as Ms. Davis’s does not constitute adverse employment action)
*Ordonez v. Canyons School District (10th Cir., November 7, 2019) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the school district: Ordonez failed to disclose in her bankruptcy proceeding her administrative claim against the school district)
*Mendiola v. Exide Technologies (10th Cir., November 6, 2019) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Exide: there is no genuine dispute that Defendants had a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for terminating Mendiola)
*Cases marked with an asterisk are not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel.
