Cases — January 3rd through 9th
Discrimination / Retaliation
*Lewis v. Twenty-First Century Bean Processing (10th Cir., January 5, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s age- and race-discrimination claims)
Wages
Nesbitt v. FCNH, Inc. (10th Cir., January 5, 2016) (affirming the district court’s order denying defendant FCNH’s motion to stay the proceedings and to compel arbitration)
Workers’ Compensation
*Lynn v. Colvin (10th Cir., January 4, 2016) (affirming Social Security Administration determinationthat the plaintiff was not disabled)
*Collins v. Colvin (10th Cir., January 6, 2016) (affirming the denial of applicaation for a period of disability, insurance benefits, and supplemental income)
*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. They may be cited, however, for persuasive value under Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
*Lewis v. Twenty-First Century Bean Processing (10th Cir., January 5, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s age- and race-discrimination claims)
Wages
Nesbitt v. FCNH, Inc. (10th Cir., January 5, 2016) (affirming the district court’s order denying defendant FCNH’s motion to stay the proceedings and to compel arbitration)
Workers’ Compensation
*Lynn v. Colvin (10th Cir., January 4, 2016) (affirming Social Security Administration determinationthat the plaintiff was not disabled)
*Collins v. Colvin (10th Cir., January 6, 2016) (affirming the denial of applicaation for a period of disability, insurance benefits, and supplemental income)
*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. They may be cited, however, for persuasive value under Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.