Cases — April 10th through 16th
Discrimination/Retaliation
*Robinson v. St. John Medical Center, Inc. (10th Cir., April 13, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of St. John on Robinson’s claims for race discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination)
*McGowan v. Board of Trustees (10th Cir., April 13, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant university on McGowan’s claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, as the university’s claim of “poor performance” was not pretextual)
Moe v. Dillon Companies, Inc. (10th Cir., April 15, 2016) (affirming judgment in favor of Dillon on Moe’s various discrimination and retaliation claims, based on Moe’s insufficient allegations)
ERISA
*Mid-South Iron Workers Welfare Plan v. Harmon (10th Cir., April 13, 2016) (affirming dismissal of plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duty)
Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety & Disease
*Cudd Pressure Control, Inc., v. New Hampshire Insurance Company (10th Cir., April 15, 2016) (affirming summary judgement in favor of insurer on Cudd’s breach of contract and breach of good faith and fair dealing claims)
*Robinson v. St. John Medical Center, Inc. (10th Cir., April 13, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of St. John on Robinson’s claims for race discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination)
*McGowan v. Board of Trustees (10th Cir., April 13, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant university on McGowan’s claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, as the university’s claim of “poor performance” was not pretextual)
Moe v. Dillon Companies, Inc. (10th Cir., April 15, 2016) (affirming judgment in favor of Dillon on Moe’s various discrimination and retaliation claims, based on Moe’s insufficient allegations)
ERISA
*Mid-South Iron Workers Welfare Plan v. Harmon (10th Cir., April 13, 2016) (affirming dismissal of plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duty)
Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety & Disease
*Cudd Pressure Control, Inc., v. New Hampshire Insurance Company (10th Cir., April 15, 2016) (affirming summary judgement in favor of insurer on Cudd’s breach of contract and breach of good faith and fair dealing claims)
*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. They may be cited, however, for persuasive value under Fed.R.App.P. 32.1 and 10th Cir.R. 32.1.