Cases — November 20th through 26th
Discrimination/Retaliation
*Lancaster v. Sprint/United Management Co. (10th Cir., November 23, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Sprint: Lancaster failed to timely serve process and unwarrantedly sought indeterminate leave under the ADA)
*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. They may be cited, however, for persuasive value under Fed.R.App.P. 32.1 and 10th Cir.R. 32.1.
*Lancaster v. Sprint/United Management Co. (10th Cir., November 23, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Sprint: Lancaster failed to timely serve process and unwarrantedly sought indeterminate leave under the ADA)
*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. They may be cited, however, for persuasive value under Fed.R.App.P. 32.1 and 10th Cir.R. 32.1.