Discrimination ~ Retaliation
*Deere v. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. (10th Cir., January 9, 2020) (affirming summary judgment in favor of XPO on his sex- and age-discrimination and retaliation claims: XPO’s actions were legitimate and nonpretextual)
*Jackson v. Kansas City Kansas Public Schools Unified School District No. 500 (10th Cir., January 7, 2020) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the Unified School District: the District acted reasonably, its reason for terminating Jackson were not pretextual, and failed to properly preserve her age-discrimination claim)
ERISA
*A.G.I. Consulting, LLC, v. American National Insurance Company (10th Cir., January 9, 2020) (affirming denial of AGI’s motion to amend its complaint to assert ERISA breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims: its motion would be time barred and would therefore be futile)
*Cases marked with an asterisk are not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel.
