Tenth Circuit: No Claim When Deputy Quit Rather than Accept Reassignment

In Lauck v. Campbell County, the Tenth Circuit upheld a district court’s ruling that dismissed a case against a sheriff’s department brought by a deputy after he was reassigned to the Civil Process Division.  Although the deputy claimed that his reassignment constituted a demotion, because his pay and rank were the same before the transfer, […]

Read More

Tenth Circuit: Because Police Officer Was Given An Extensive Opportunity to Rebut Claims He Had No Complaint

In Skogen v. Overland Park, the Tenth Circuit ruled that a police officer who had been terminated for off-duty conduct had no complaint for a violation of due process because an extensive investigation was conducted before he was fired. The court also concluded that the police department had a significant interest in preserving the integrity […]

Read More

Tenth Circuit: Municipality Not Liable for Employing Badly Trained Forensic Expert

In Bryson v. Oklahoma City, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Oklahoma City had no liability for its failure to properly supervise and train an expert forensic chemist who had testified in a trial that DNA from the plaintiff was found on a rape victim even though the tests clearly exonerated the plaintiff. […]

Read More

Claims under Utah Whistleblower Act Must be Filed Within 180 Days or They Are Barred

In Thorpe v. Washington City, the Utah Court of Appeals declared that an employee who failed to file a complaint in a court raising his Utah Protection of Public Employees Act (“Whistleblower Act”) claims within 180 days was barred.  The employee attempted to circumvent the requirements of the Whistleblower Act by claiming that a Notice […]

Read More

Utah Valley State College and Two Administrators Should Have Been Dismissed from Suit

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals—the federal appellate court having jurisdiction over Utah—reversed a district court decision that allowed a former instructor at Utah Valley State College (UVSC) to remove his Age Discrimination in Employment Act and civil rights complaints to state court.  In Helmick v. UVSC, the Tenth Circuit ruled that once the trial court […]

Read More

Demoted School Administrator Age Discrimination Claim Should Not Have Been Dismissed

In Jones v. Oklahoma City Public Schools, the Tenth Circuit—the federal appellate court having jurisdiction over Utah— overruled the decision of the trial court dismissing the claims of a school administrator for having too weak of a case of discrimination.  Although the trial court ruled that the administrator had presented evidence of discrimination, it ruled that the evidence […]

Read More

Public Employer Not Immune From Suit for Firing for a Claim that He Was Fired for Losing A Defamation Claim

On August 24, 2010, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals—the federal court having jurisdiction over Utah—ruled in Deutsch v. Jordan that a sheriff could continue in his claims against a city manager for firing him for what she claimed was his false testimony in a private law suit he brought against a citizen.  The private citizen had […]

Read More

Public Employee Threatening Life of Police Chief Justifiably Terminated

In Turner v. Lone Peak Public Safety District, the Utah Court of Appeals upheld the rather uncontroversial determination of a local government entity appeals board that an employee’s threat to kill his boss, the police chief, justified his termination.  The fact that the employee was under the influence did not excuse the threat nor did […]

Read More

A Governmental Entity’s Audit of Text Messages was Reasonable Despite Assumption that Text’s were Private.

On Thursday, June 17, the United States Supreme Court upheld the discipline of a police officer for sending personal and some sexually explicit text messages on a city provided pager.  In Ontario v. Quon, the Supreme Court assumed without holding that the police officer had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his text messages.  It […]

Read More

United States Supreme Court Concludes that Every Time a Discriminatory Practice is Used, it Gives Rise to Discrimination Claim

In a decision issued May 24, 2010, the United States Supreme Court ruled that, in claims of disparate impact, every time a discriminatory practice is used a new cause of action arises, even if the decision establishing that practice was made after the statute of limitations has run.  Justice Scalia, writing the opinion for the Court […]

Read More